4 ms·
Nice article. With a different name this might catch on. Even without the association with a disorganised useless twat it doesn't even flow in ordinary convers
by nprateem 4y ago
Nice article. With a different name this might catch on.
Even without the association with a disorganised useless twat it doesn't even flow in ordinary conversation. "We're going to do a Boris today". What does that mean, fuck up the future of the company?
- tibanne 4y agoThis. Another name please. Possibly not Donald.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- rjsw 4y agoThe name might be appropriate. A tool that delivers really good bullshit could be just what managers want.
- benj111 4y ago>I call this tradeoff-oriented process Boris. The name I have given to this process has no connection with politicians who seem not to understand that any action taken entails tradeoffs which must be accepted. Although I think they protest too much. Anyway what's wrong with Boris. Would it make you feel better if it was an awkward acronym BORRYYS. Or do we need a catchy name that can then become a verb so we all feel hip and with it when we're 'Avalanching' or whatever.