4 ms·
The scanning for known fingerprints in Apple’s scheme only happened sever side. Unlike Google, Apple didn’t have access to all photos in an unencrypted form to
by ec109685 4y ago
The scanning for known fingerprints in Apple’s scheme only happened sever side.
Unlike Google, Apple didn’t have access to all photos in an unencrypted form to do whatever they pleased with them. If and only if 5 photo fingerprints matched a known csam photo, could Apple view a thumbnail of the photo.
How could that possibly be thought of as worse than Google’s “we can see all your data all the time” approach?
- mrtksn 4y agoThe fingerprinting doesn't happen by magic, your device analyses your photos and sends the results to Apple for control and Apple alert the authorities once enough matches happen because once enough matches happen your photos are decrypted for human inspection. Inconsequential implementation details. Your device still acts as a snitch for whatever the authorities are looking for. Today looking for CSAM match tomorrow can be environmentalism, abortion, meat products etc - depending on how the politics evolve.
- ec109685 4y agoApple’s severs are the snitches and they can only snitch if you upload five matching fingerprints. Fine to think that scanning for csam is wrong, but the fact that it’s based on fingerprints sent to the cloud doesn’t make their scheme worse than Google who has access to unencrypted photo data to do whatever they want with (as argued by many in this thread).