> Of course, not everyone will agree with their decision, but it wasn’t done haphazardly. Needless to say, the question in context should have been whether it

> Of course, not everyone will agree with their decision, but it wasn’t done haphazardly. Needless to say, the question in context should have been whether it was done "effecitvely". Fine fine, if you want to throw a ton of conferences or whatever owning a forum to do it in might plausibly save you money. Was throwing a ton of conferences really the best, most effective use of fifteen million pounds at furthering the betterment of mankind? I think we all know the answer to that. They wanted to throw a ton of parties and raise a ton of money and wanted to spend that money on stuff that made them feel important.