2 ms·
Forced to is a problematic term though. A company can be "forced to" because they don't want to stand up in court for the rights of their customers. They can
by einhverfr 15y ago
Forced to is a problematic term though. A company can be "forced to" because they don't want to stand up in court for the rights of their customers. They can be "forced to" because not doing so would subject them to bad press or just look bad.
The problem here is that the terms can be read in a very one-sided way (leaving aside the questions of adherence contract interpretation) and therefore all the power in the interaction is held by the registrar.