4 ms·
It is actually the opposite, you are the one advocating for controlling speech. Telling Twitter or any other private organization that they have to spread infor
by jliptzin 4y ago
It is actually the opposite, you are the one advocating for controlling speech. Telling Twitter or any other private organization that they have to spread information on their private platform that they consider harmful or damaging to themselves or their business is a violation of their speech.
If I host a comment section on my blog and someone starts posting nazi propaganda I should have the right to remove those posts. Or any other posts I don’t like. Twitter is just a bigger version of that.
If you don’t like twitter’s moderation policies don’t use twitter, use truth social or Parler or 4chan or whatever.
- tekknik 4y agoTwitter does not speak when someone posts. This is a ridiculous take on free speech and is a bit concerning if you actually think this way.
- tekknik 4y agoHere you go, a perfect example just came up: https://www.foxnews.com/us/retired-navy-seal-made-famous-coming-out-trans-announces-detransition-destroyed-my-life https://www.foxnews.com/us/retired-navy-seal-made-famous-com... While CNN has many many articles on the individual, they’re missing this one.