5 ms·
The issue isn't the punishment, it's the crime. There are many crimes for which freezing ones bank account is a pretty good idea. On the list of crimes that t
by mywittyname 4y ago
The issue isn't the punishment, it's the crime.
There are many crimes for which freezing ones bank account is a pretty good idea. On the list of crimes that this is an inappropriate punishment would be: refusing to wear a piece of fabric on your head for the arbitrary reason that some book says it should be so.
I want the punishments to fit the crime. I'm okay with murders going to jail. I'm not okay with jay walkers going to jail.
- chrismcb 4y agoMost crimes are a crime "because some book says it should be" that book is typically a law book, but still.
- version_five 4y agoThen wait until you hear how Canada handled peaceful protestors
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- joifw 4y ago
- akiselev 4y agoSpotted the absolutist. That’s how you tell the difference between a philosopher and theologian.
- brink 4y agoI don't completely agree with joifw's sentiment, but philosophy sits on thin ice when everything inevitably means nothing in the end.
- akiselev 4y agoThat's the edgy layman's philosophy, aka nihilism. It's a branch of philosophy most philosophers don't take very seriously, if at all.
- HKH2 4y agoThe best thing about philosophy is you can just make an argument without appealing to authority.
- akiselev 4y agoYou call it "appealing to authority," I call it "standing on the shoulders of giants." It's philosophy for god's sake. There is no authority [callback]. You can cherry pick which parts you believe and it doesn't make a damn bit of difference. [callback] Except if you're a theologian... which is why most philosophers take the theologian subset even less seriously than they do the existential nihilists.
- HKH2 4y agoYou say there is no authority, yet you keep appealing to it. Who cares what is in vogue in philosophy? Just respond with an argument.
- lepus 4y agoConsidering you created multiple accounts to promote a viewpoint to create a false sense of consensus rather than arguing in good faith, I'd say maybe god could have taught you more ethics https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=fjweoijf https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=fjweoijf
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- warbler73 4y ago
- joxel 4y ago[flagged]
- HKH2 4y agoBLM protesters attacked people in cars. What would you do if that happened to you?
- Eddy_Viscosity2 4y ago"Most jarring of all, the law grants civil immunity to drivers who ram into protesting crowds and even injure or kill participants, if they claim the protests made them concerned for their own well-being in the moment." That's a pretty low bar to get away with murder. But at least they had access to their bank accounts right up until a car smashed their bodies into the asphalt.
- HKH2 4y agoIf the protesters weren't directly threatening the people in the car, I agree. It's becoming more and more obvious that laws are ineffective without a shared culture.
- throw_a_grenade 4y agoI'm sorry to discuss meta-HN and scores, but judging from the upvotes it clearly is about punishment (not about the crime, this subject is pretty clear to everyone here).
- ajsnigrutin 4y agoCrimes are relative and sometimes very localized. > refusing to wear a piece of fabric on your head for the arbitrary reason that some book says it should be so. What abouts (not) wearing pants and underwear infront of children? > I want the punishments to fit the crime. I'm okay with murders going to jail. I'm not okay with jay walkers going to jail. How do you know someone actually commited murder? Shouldn't there be a process, with investigations, lawyers, proof, judges, juries, etc. first?
- quantified 4y agoBeing naked should not be a crime anywhere.