4 ms·

That's NAT64. It's something that Hetzner could and should be providing for their customers, but as far as I can see they aren't.

• topspin 4y ago
  Well ok... the problem stops right there then. Why would anyone expect -- given the low adoption of IPv6 -- IPv6 sans NAT64 to be workable? Why even bother without it? I don't imagine it would be hard to locate any number of IPv6 zealots proselytizing a NAT64-less world, but here we have someone that made a legitimate effort to apply IPv6 and failed because it wasn't there. One fewer potential convert added to the pile...
  • Dagger2 4y ago
    It's workable if all of the machines you're going to talk to have v6, which is doable. Or you can run your own NAT64. It would also be very easy to suggest that maybe Hetzner want to encourage people to keep paying for v4.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]