I don’t think it’s that odd. It’s just that probably you, like many others, see Emacs as a programming editor / IDE, while RMS sees the much broader applicabili

I don’t think it’s that odd. It’s just that probably you, like many others, see Emacs as a programming editor / IDE, while RMS sees the much broader applicability of this software. Nowadays if you want WYSIWYG you don’t even own the data anymore, it’s a Microsoft or Google editor as a SaaS in the browser. So Emacs covering this use case too would be extremely powerful and coherent from the software freedom angle.