Your post advocates that we don't act on the grounds that we should act. Silly. Advocacy often falls into the trap of trying to act uniformly, as if there is

Your post advocates that we don't act on the grounds that we should act. Silly. Advocacy often falls into the trap of trying to act uniformly, as if there is only one appropriate action for an individual of a movement to take. One individual does not have the capacity to decide those battles which should be fought and those battles from which we should gracefully withdraw. This is, in fact, because every battle that we have the present capacity to fight ought be undertaken: Unless, of course, there is only one battle upon which the war depends. But this is not so currently; your own multitude of (in my experience, only marginally important) battlefields demonstrates this.