> I mention this because your post suggested that employers were required to do more I'm sorry my post suggested that -- it was not intentional. As you note, e

> I mention this because your post suggested that employers were required to do more I'm sorry my post suggested that -- it was not intentional. As you note, employers have no monetary obligations to former employees under COBRA. My intent was to offer a reason why Plaid, having decided to give employees money towards health care, would opt for cash vs extending the Plaid's existing policy to cover non-employees. Totally get the rantyness. My experiences with COBRA have not been great either and your points are good ones.