4 ms·
Neat, very different results. But still looking at it from the wrong direction? That is, ipv6 for clients. But I'm more interested in servers, because that is
by tjoff 4y ago
Neat, very different results. But still looking at it from the wrong direction?
That is, ipv6 for clients. But I'm more interested in servers, because that is what would affect me if I don't have IPv4. Such as the experiences described by OP in this thread.
- noipv6 4y agoipv6-only web sites are borderline nonexistant, because no one who needs to maintain a profit dares to cut off a revenue stream from legacy ip only users (yet). the most exhaustive list thus far is https://sites.ip-update.net/ https://sites.ip-update.net/ afaik
- tjoff 4y agoI'm not asking for ipv6-only, but ipv4-only. Those are the ones blocking adoption for me, as an end user.