3 ms·
Unfortunately, in a highly regulated environment like finance or healthcare this is the norm for opsec reasons. Can't have disgruntled laid-off employees taking
by PhoenixReborn 4y ago
Unfortunately, in a highly regulated environment like finance or healthcare this is the norm for opsec reasons. Can't have disgruntled laid-off employees taking revenge actions against the company or customers.
- thiscatis 4y agoExactly, and as a regulated company you get audited on your affected leavers process with proof of time stamps for access removal.
- cochne 4y agoWhy not just send the email first, so that people don't have to wait in suspense to see if they still have a job?
- playoff_burner 4y agoThe suspense lasted 1 minute. The "team update" and cut/no-cut emails went out pretty much simultaneously.
- salawat 4y agoWe're talking about Plaid here. The company that willfully violated every norm around credential handling, implemented fraudulent front-end lookalikes to harvest user credentials, and then used those to reap customer financial records in blatant violation of BSA, and again, 90% of the ethial mores of a responsible finance company. https://angeion-public.s3.amazonaws.com/www.PlaidSettlement.com/docs/Consolidated+Amended+Class+Action+Complaint+for+Damages+and+Declaratory+and+Equitable+Relief.pdf https://angeion-public.s3.amazonaws.com/www.PlaidSettlement.... Reached via: https://www.plaidsettlement.com/important-documents.php https://www.plaidsettlement.com/important-documents.php I will not, nor would I recommend anyone extend benefit of a doubt when it comes to this org in particular. While you are factially correct in the general case, I'd hate for people to leave with the idea that Plaid has ever concerned itself with compliance when there was a buck to be made or an inconvenient norm to be worked around unethically.