Your comment just reads as a "just-so" story, which deems female behavior too difficult to study or understand. It's just as pseudo-scientific if not more than

Your comment just reads as a "just-so" story, which deems female behavior too difficult to study or understand. It's just as pseudo-scientific if not more than the attempts at explaining group behavior and mating preferences (not this article though, it's also trash). > I'd venture to say that what women are looking for is defined much more by their environment than their biology. It's the classic nature vs nurture argument, for which you conveniently provide no supporting evidence. Note that I don't claim either one to be dominant or correct over the other, while you do. The burden of proof here lies on you.