3 ms·
I think IPv6 internal-only is viable with some kind of NAT64 setup, maybe not at scale though. What is everyone using for NAT64?
by candiddevmike 4y ago
I think IPv6 internal-only is viable with some kind of NAT64 setup, maybe not at scale though. What is everyone using for NAT64?
- noipv6 4y agoafaik jool is the currently-recommended foss nat64 (since tayga is apparently unmaintained) alot of commercial vendors have mature nat64 implementations tho
- rnhmjoj 4y agoJool also has the best documentation I've ever seen. It does not only explain how to configure the software but it also has illustrated explanations that do a far better job than the actual RFCs in describing the motivation and use cases of the many protocols it supports.
- noipv6 4y ago& for "at scale" - how about 100,000,000 users? https://twitter.com/iPv4depletion/status/1584376525427978240 https://twitter.com/iPv4depletion/status/1584376525427978240
- gurrone 4y agoWould use OpenBSD + unbound to get NAT64 + DNS64. I'd prefer a dual-stack setup with RFC1918 IPv4 internally + a NAT44 gateway and IPv6 "just" on top. Drawback: if you find yourself to have to do a lot of firewalling it essentially doubles your work.