5 ms·
But that's not how lots of people have used it there. I see your point but to quote: "Delete I would suggest a merge" "Delete. This is not notable enough for
by Festro 4y ago
But that's not how lots of people have used it there. I see your point but to quote:
"Delete I would suggest a merge"
"Delete. This is not notable enough for its own article and should be in the main Hunter Biden laptop controversy article."
"Delete - I'm also of the opinion that this could very well fit in Hunter Biden laptop controversy"
"Delete -- under the scope of the laptop article."
Perhaps the nuance here is either 1) people are idiots and meant 'merge' but said 'delete' or 2) there's no need to merge anything if it all already elsewhere, so just delete this redundant article
- josephcsible 4y agoIn your case 2, the correct thing to say still isn't "delete", but is rather "redirect", so I guess that points to case 1.
- detaro 4y ago"merge" is basically "delete and ...", voting "delete" over "merge" doesn't mean that you think the content can't be integrated elsewhere, hence the distinction is not that important for a deletion vote.
- josephcsible 4y agoNot quite. An important difference is whether the old page history remains publicly viewable.
- detaro 4y agoOh, true, I misremembered that and thought that always required extra action, but that was if you wanted part of the history wiped while preserving the page.