> destroying people's trust in elections. I don’t understand, do you think we should have blind trust in election, that there shouldn’t be partisan and indepen

> destroying people's trust in elections. I don’t understand, do you think we should have blind trust in election, that there shouldn’t be partisan and independent observers, that security measures shouldn’t be scrutinized? And if we find a fault, we shouldn’t call for reforms. We should just “trust” the system? No, this is not the same as denying the results without evidence. There is no equivalence here.