3 ms·

> Maybe listen and draw your own conclusions? That’s the thing, the same could be said of any random piece of media ever made, but I have neither the time nor

> Maybe listen and draw your own conclusions? That’s the thing, the same could be said of any random piece of media ever made, but I have neither the time nor the interest in going through all of it. There are plenty of quality programs out there, and I don’t want to realize I should have spent that time listening to In Our Time an hour into the show. I’m opposed to CBDCs. But this person generally seems to present himself as a conspiracy theorist, and I’d rather start with a more meat-and-potatoes approach. And I’m not sure what removal from social media has to do with whether or not he’s worth listening to.

kolanos 4y ago
> That’s the thing, the same could be said of any random piece of media ever made, but I have neither the time nor the interest in going through all of it. Then I am not sure what you are hoping to achieve with this kind of commentary. Why not just move on? Should I not have shared the best podcast I have thus far found about CBDCs because it doesn't meet the ad hominem Google check? If that's the case, then that's a shame because a lot of good sources were swept up in COVID cancellation fever for no good reason. > And I’m not sure what removal from social media has to do with whether or not he’s worth listening to. Because the sources you're relying on that portray him as a conspiracy nut are the same ones that were cancelling every other person who had something to say about COVID that wasn't sanctioned by the CDC/NIH (Google). Corbett's supposed crime that resulted in his cancellation was playing clips of Anthony Fauci making contradicting statements to the media days/weeks apart and turning it into a game of "simon says".
- mypastself 4y ago
  As I said in the parent comment (and as confirmed by the other commenter), he seems to present himself as a conspiracy theorist. One of the first search results was an AMA he did on r/conspiracy. But you’re right, I’ll move on. I might even give the show a listen sometime. I just prefer looking at things from a more mainstream perspective first.

kolanos 4y ago

> That’s the thing, the same could be said of any random piece of media ever made, but I have neither the time nor the interest in going through all of it. Then I am not sure what you are hoping to achieve with this kind of commentary. Why not just move on? Should I not have shared the best podcast I have thus far found about CBDCs because it doesn't meet the ad hominem Google check? If that's the case, then that's a shame because a lot of good sources were swept up in COVID cancellation fever for no good reason. > And I’m not sure what removal from social media has to do with whether or not he’s worth listening to. Because the sources you're relying on that portray him as a conspiracy nut are the same ones that were cancelling every other person who had something to say about COVID that wasn't sanctioned by the CDC/NIH (Google). Corbett's supposed crime that resulted in his cancellation was playing clips of Anthony Fauci making contradicting statements to the media days/weeks apart and turning it into a game of "simon says".

mypastself 4y ago
As I said in the parent comment (and as confirmed by the other commenter), he seems to present himself as a conspiracy theorist. One of the first search results was an AMA he did on r/conspiracy. But you’re right, I’ll move on. I might even give the show a listen sometime. I just prefer looking at things from a more mainstream perspective first.