3 ms·
I think it will depend highly on how the copyright story, settles. Many of the current big name models have been seen to reproduce their sources, verbatim. For
by shakna 4y ago
I think it will depend highly on how the copyright story, settles.
Many of the current big name models have been seen to reproduce their sources, verbatim. For now, it doesn't seem like the story on that one has a definitive answer. There are lots of brushing it off as being rare, or you have to school it to do that, etc. But that it still happens, is the issue.
We'll probably end up with more specific copyright carve-outs, or we'll end up with royalty systems, but its unlikely that this issue keeps getting handwaved for the foreseeable future.
- mensetmanusman 4y agoA sentence is like a few pixels of an image. Of course there will be ’verbatim’ reproductions of a few pixels of data, but that goes to zero the more information that is outputted.
- shakna 4y agoCreative works are not scientific expressions, in the main. There have been successful copyright cases, where someone creates something new, but it contains something that has been created before. A character, like Mickey Mouse, or some other player. The entire work is new, undeniably, and it is still a violation of the rights of the copyright owner. Fan Fiction is fine, but only within some very strong restrictions. You can't turn around and create a new product out of it, without undertaking some very careful changes first. Fan Fiction isn't copying any sentences. No pixels. But it can still be stealing, if you step a foot wrong. If you allow your AI to be trained on non-free data - the copyright question of whether it is now safe to use as a product, is not yet fully determined.