3 ms·
It depends on what you mean by "learn". JS is much easier to become bad at quickly, which is not a bad thing. Lisp is an ever-expanding paradigm, but you can
by sshine 4y ago
It depends on what you mean by "learn".
JS is much easier to become bad at quickly, which is not a bad thing.
Lisp is an ever-expanding paradigm, but you can learn it at a steady pace like JS.
JS is directly transferrable to similar-syntax languages, yes.
But Lisp provides insight into techniques that will expand your knowledge and understanding of all programming languages.
Does JS have a music video like this? (The Land of Lisp)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM1Zb3xmvMc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM1Zb3xmvMc
- eimrine 4y ago> Does JS have a music video like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxi0ETwDvws https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxi0ETwDvws ("Bug in the Javascript", not music video but video of musician performing vocal and harmonica parts of song)