4 ms·

Then don't introduce the term in to the conversation. You're shockingly dishonest in your rhetoric by doing so. To quote you before: > One can argue that the o

Then don't introduce the term in to the conversation. You're shockingly dishonest in your rhetoric by doing so. To quote you before: > One can argue that the original contract is tantamount to a slave contract, thereby null and void at the outset.

wellbehaved 4y ago
You have a reading disability, trying to pinpoint precisely where will likely only serve illustrate it further. "You're shockingly dishonest" Are your panties truly in a bunch over this thread, or are you just feigning your "shock"? It matters not; either is laughable.