Respectfully I disagree with this. The article you linked is mostly just a copy+paste of the apple page, with a few paragraphs removed. I personally don't thi

Respectfully I disagree with this. The article you linked is mostly just a copy+paste of the apple page, with a few paragraphs removed. I personally don't think going from the direct news source -> random news source you just googled that copy+pasted most of it anyway is worth doing. > but corporate press releases are so awful to read that I increasingly think we need to make them an exception. Is it really that much better if they just removed 2~3 paragraphs? They added nothing of value other then trackers and ads. I do ask seriously - does removing 2~3 paragraphs really make it that much better? Are we really going to move to having one person (no offense) to arbitrarily change the URLs from the official news source to a random one from your google search results? tl;dr - doing this removes the benefits of first hand reporting, has effectively no different content, and you appeared to have randomly selected one that offers no clear benefit in it's content.