3 ms·
I like this allegory because it puts the complexity into a visual mindset and brings to light an interesting question about the nature of our abstractions.. For
by dijit 4y ago
I like this allegory because it puts the complexity into a visual mindset and brings to light an interesting question about the nature of our abstractions.. For example:
Are our abstractions I-beams or Pre-Fabs[0]?
We all know that the rise of pre-fabs is, at its heart, the story of cheap developments all lazily (and hastily) thrown together in arrangements that are of low quality, mid-to-low beauty and do not last for very long.
Skyscrapers of the early 20th century stand today (with I-Beams) and are considered by many to be beautiful, maintainable etc;
People want pre-fabs, since they're cheap, the economy will always be in the pre-fab.
But pre-fabs have a limited shelf-life, and reconstruction is more expensive than spending a little extra up front cost.
[0]: This is the sort of pre-fab I am talking about: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefabricated_building#/media/File:Plattenbauten_02_Lobeda_West-2011.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefabricated_building#/media/...
- AtlasBarfed 4y agoI-beams are programming languages, libraries, and compilers. Pre-fabs are massive frameworks where mixing them always looks hack-glued together. Same as if you glue two prefabs from different vendors. That said, industrial plants aren't gothic cathedrals. They are a collection of buildings plopped together.
- dijit 4y agoI think that's a pretty good categorisation that I could definitely agree with. So I guess with that allegory you have to ask: Am I building a factory, an office, a home or a cathedral. You can then plan your architecture accordingly.