3 ms·
That wasn't Hofstadter's point. Hofstadter didn't try to "disprove" the possibility of having AI -- he only set out to show that certain approaches couldn't wor
by ogogmad 4y ago
That wasn't Hofstadter's point. Hofstadter didn't try to "disprove" the possibility of having AI -- he only set out to show that certain approaches couldn't work. GPT's approach isn't one of those he argued against. You seem to be referring instead to Penrose and Lucas, but their arguments have convinced virtually no one.
- PaulHoule 4y agoMy point is that you can relax constraints such as Gödel's incompleteness theorems if you are going to give it credit when it gets wrong answers. It might be able to write a TV Show like Sliders but it won't be able to do real physics, for instance.