I wonder if someone who's familiar with the process of language acquisition could tell whether chatGPT makes errors similar to those a human would make. Like t

I wonder if someone who's familiar with the process of language acquisition could tell whether chatGPT makes errors similar to those a human would make. Like this one >Does the slime see the earth under the sky while eating the food? whereas the correct one was >Does the earth's sky see the slime eat food I could easily see someone learning the language interpret as the former because it seems to make more sense at first. --- Also the response to >Now, restate your opinion on Glorp in Glorp, inventing any new words and grammar that you require to express yourself. Is again pretty amazing. It shows evidence of the same self-modeling capabilities that were seen in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33847479 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33847479 The outputted python code provides a literal word for word translation, but I guess it's expecting too much for it to encode english grammar into the program.