4 ms·
I am much more in agreement with you than not. But I see Hancock, presented with evidence indicating a better alternative than his own, cheerfully accepting it.
by moloch-hai 4y ago
I am much more in agreement with you than not. But I see Hancock, presented with evidence indicating a better alternative than his own, cheerfully accepting it. Most likely he would come up with another speculation consistent with the new facts. He certainly harbors lots of deeply kooky ideas, but doesn't seem as attached to them as my favorite kooks are.
I don't know if anybody has tried taking him aside to explain how Earth's rotational precession is wholly divorced from solar system orbital dynamics, or if he could understand it if they did. His notion of Gobekli Tepe built as a red warning to us about the scheduled upcoming comet strike is easily his kookiest, and has been a serious distraction from his main interest.
On a different tangent, I only just found out about megaliths in Montana. If those are all erratics, some glacier was being awfully artful about it.
https://www.montanamegaliths.com/uploads/6/9/2/9/69295147/tizer-julie-purple_orig.jpg https://www.montanamegaliths.com/uploads/6/9/2/9/69295147/ti...
https://www.galacticfacets.com/uploads/9/4/8/8/9488982/1345397_orig.jpg https://www.galacticfacets.com/uploads/9/4/8/8/9488982/13453...