3 ms·
I thought it was long admitted, even by the NYT (citation below) in a recent reorg, that they were controlled by the Democrats to an extent that even they found
by jjtheblunt 4y ago
I thought it was long admitted, even by the NYT (citation below) in a recent reorg, that they were controlled by the Democrats to an extent that even they found losing them readership and thus money.
That said, I can't find an exact citation, but one article back then noted replacing editors in attempt to be more neutral.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/17/new-york-times-editor-admits-paper-is-very-very-ve/ https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/17/new-york-ti...
- tom-thistime 4y agoAt some point the NYT just got rabies where Trump was concerned. The news pages became gross and distracting even to folks like me who are normally core NYT readers. Now this is nuanced, ok? Trump has publicly called for elimination of the Constitution. That's not the media, that's him. But anyway, re the NYT, the really important point (for me) is that they allowed the front page to become unreasonable and unreadable. Maybe it has recovered now. I don't know. I'm afraid to look.
- jjtheblunt 4y agoi subscribe; it's more balanced, perhaps because of the results mentioned in the article i linked above.