4 ms·

I'm curious on why you think reporting has been abysmal in Ukraine?

• miguelazo 4y ago
  https://fair.org/home/us-medias-intellectual-no-fly-zone-on-us-culpability-in-nord-stream-attack/ https://fair.org/home/us-medias-intellectual-no-fly-zone-on-... https://fair.org/?s=ukraine https://fair.org/?s=ukraine
  • yks 4y ago
    looks like you complain that the media is not working for the rich and powerful, i.e. Putin?
    • miguelazo 4y ago
      They've been working for the rich and powerful just fine. https://peoplesworld.org/article/pipeline-ploy-how-u-s-natural-gas-interests-are-fueling-the-ukraine-crisis/ https://peoplesworld.org/article/pipeline-ploy-how-u-s-natur...
  • Aaronstotle 4y ago
    It seems that they are critiquing two major news sources (NYT & WSJ). I've been following the conflict from BBC News and The Economist, and the reporting has been solid in my opinion. This site also only seems to push back against more left-wing news outlets, I didn't see anything saying how Fox News pushing for appeasement isn't a good idea.
    • miguelazo 4y ago
      Ah yes, questioning the wisdom of sending tens of billions of dollars in weapons and cash to a regime controlled by neonazis and that is so corrupt it was denied EU membership is "appeasement".
      • yks 4y ago
        > a regime controlled by neonazis Current approved position is that they are "satanists", didn't you hear?