Your interpretation here is very kind. I really don’t understand how anyone can read this and think it somehow indicates we’re “supposed to believe SBF’s claims

Your interpretation here is very kind. I really don’t understand how anyone can read this and think it somehow indicates we’re “supposed to believe SBF’s claims”. Bankman-Fried deflected the FT’s questions about the excessive borrowing and soured investments that ultimately sank Alameda, blowing a hole in FTX’s finances, and would not be drawn on the legal consequences he may face. He said he deliberately avoided getting involved in Alameda’s trading and risk management to avoid conflicts with his position as chief executive of FTX, and neglected to monitor the risk they posed to the exchange.