2 ms·
You don't think law enforcement considers whether it has enough evidence for a conviction prior to arresting someone, especially if that person is 1) actively p
by ethanbond 4y ago
You don't think law enforcement considers whether it has enough evidence for a conviction prior to arresting someone, especially if that person is 1) actively producing more evidence of the crime by the minute, 2) not apparently a flight risk, and 3) not actively further harming the public?
- coldtea 4y ago>You don't think law enforcement considers whether it has enough evidence for a conviction prior to arresting someone I do. Do you consider what I wrote amounting to the above? >especially if that person is 1) actively producing more evidence of the crime by the minute, 2) not apparently a flight risk, and 3) not actively further harming the public? A flight risk is 100% a thing. What is the opposite based on, that he is an idiot, or that even if he is he wont get some advice on that end? That's crazy talk.