3 ms·
It's not at all surprising that the corporate media has failed on this aspect of the story, they're the ones who hyped this guy to the moon, after all. Most of
by miguelazo 4y ago
It's not at all surprising that the corporate media has failed on this aspect of the story, they're the ones who hyped this guy to the moon, after all. Most of the so-called journalists are just stenographers for the rich and powerful-- just look at their abysmal reporting on Ukraine.
- Aaronstotle 4y agoI'm curious on why you think reporting has been abysmal in Ukraine?
- miguelazo 4y agohttps://fair.org/home/us-medias-intellectual-no-fly-zone-on-us-culpability-in-nord-stream-attack/ https://fair.org/home/us-medias-intellectual-no-fly-zone-on-... https://fair.org/?s=ukraine https://fair.org/?s=ukraine
- yks 4y agolooks like you complain that the media is not working for the rich and powerful, i.e. Putin?
- miguelazo 4y agoThey've been working for the rich and powerful just fine. https://peoplesworld.org/article/pipeline-ploy-how-u-s-natural-gas-interests-are-fueling-the-ukraine-crisis/ https://peoplesworld.org/article/pipeline-ploy-how-u-s-natur...
- Aaronstotle 4y agoIt seems that they are critiquing two major news sources (NYT & WSJ). I've been following the conflict from BBC News and The Economist, and the reporting has been solid in my opinion. This site also only seems to push back against more left-wing news outlets, I didn't see anything saying how Fox News pushing for appeasement isn't a good idea.
- miguelazo 4y agoAh yes, questioning the wisdom of sending tens of billions of dollars in weapons and cash to a regime controlled by neonazis and that is so corrupt it was denied EU membership is "appeasement".
- yks 4y ago> a regime controlled by neonazis Current approved position is that they are "satanists", didn't you hear?