3 ms·
The article doesn't link to or mention the case number; from Reuters[1]: (which might be a better URL for this item anyway?) > The case is Hughes et al v. Appl
by smileybarry 4y ago
The article doesn't link to or mention the case number; from Reuters[1]: (which might be a better URL for this item anyway?)
> The case is Hughes et al v. Apple Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-07668.
Link to the case filing: https://unicourt.com/case/pc-db5-hughes-et-al-v-apple-inc-1351511 https://unicourt.com/case/pc-db5-hughes-et-al-v-apple-inc-13...
1: https://www.reuters.com/legal/apple-is-sued-by-women-who-say-airtag-lets-stalkers-track-victims-2022-12-06/ https://www.reuters.com/legal/apple-is-sued-by-women-who-say...
- tyingq 4y agoHelpful, though it's a link to only some very superficial info on the case. Downloading the documents from there is only free for "crowdsourced" documents. I imagine someone will download from PACER and publish it publicly sometime later today though.