4 ms·
Isn't it hypocritical to dismiss that argument, though? Arguably if you cared about animal wellbeing you'd start with the farming industry. I'm not saying shu
by raducu 4y ago
Isn't it hypocritical to dismiss that argument, though?
Arguably if you cared about animal wellbeing you'd start with the farming industry.
I'm not saying shutdown animal-cruelty cops because the farming industry is far worse than individuals abusing animals, but those 1500 animals killed were killed in the name of science.
- striking 4y agoNo, they were killed in the name of Elon Musk. Not for science, but for "speed".
- havelhovel 4y agoThey aren't dismissing the argument. They're saying pretty plainly that both things can be bad, and therefore both can be addressed simultaneously. Taking the stance that animal welfare activists can't care about anything else until the insanely divisive issue of factory farming is solved, on the other hand, is being dismissive of the issue at hand. It's whataboutism. Moreover, someone might take issue with animals being sacrificed for Neuralink while being okay with animals suffering for human consumption. Such a take would be nuanced, not hypocritical.