> If some recent headlines about declining sperm counts are to be believed Spoiler, they probably aren't. There are questions with the quality of the studies

> If some recent headlines about declining sperm counts are to be believed Spoiler, they probably aren't. There are questions with the quality of the studies used: > Even so, Marion Boulicault of Harvard, Sarah S. Richardson and colleagues, publishing in the journal Human Fertility, suggest weaknesses in the data, such as men’s ages only being known in two-thirds of the cases and other missing crucial information. sperm count is not linearly tied to fertility: > Who says the sperm count observed in the ’70s in the “West” was the species’ optimum? Sperm count above a critical threshold “is not necessarily an indicator of better health or higher probability of fertility relative to less,” and finally, no one as far as I am aware is able to present solid data on any causal link which makes projecting the trend out to apocalyptic scenarios another 30+ years in the future a very fraught endeavor in the first place. https://www.haaretz.com/science-and-health/2021-05-10/ty-article/.premium/spermaggedon-in-the-west-relax-harvard-has-good-news-for-you/0000017f-e0c8-d75c-a7ff-fccdcc640000 https://www.haaretz.com/science-and-health/2021-05-10/ty-art...