3 ms·
There is no difference when the end result is destroying people's trust in elections. You are clearly biased. Maybe you should look into how the US meddles in
by macinjosh 4y ago
There is no difference when the end result is destroying people's trust in elections. You are clearly biased.
Maybe you should look into how the US meddles in foreign elections. It is something countries do to each other. Russia has always done that and so have we. There was nothing special about 2016. These complaints about CA are the left's equivalent of when the right says there is mass voter fraud because of one or two minor instances of election fraud.
- runarberg 4y ago> destroying people's trust in elections. I don’t understand, do you think we should have blind trust in election, that there shouldn’t be partisan and independent observers, that security measures shouldn’t be scrutinized? And if we find a fault, we shouldn’t call for reforms. We should just “trust” the system? No, this is not the same as denying the results without evidence. There is no equivalence here.