3 ms·

> Unfortunately, in the AI world, they seldom solve the hard problems - generating hype is enough. This is untrue on so many levels. You can probably guess who

by agolio 4y ago

> Unfortunately, in the AI world, they seldom solve the hard problems - generating hype is enough. This is untrue on so many levels. You can probably guess who wrote the rest of my comment. There are many examples of AI being used to improve various aspects of our lives. For instance, AI is being used in healthcare to improve the accuracy of diagnoses and to develop new treatments for diseases. In the field of transportation, AI is being used to develop self-driving cars and trucks that can improve safety and efficiency on the roads. In the retail industry, AI is being used to personalize customer experiences and improve the accuracy of inventory management. Additionally, AI is being used in finance to improve the accuracy of credit scoring and fraud detection.

bachmeier 4y ago
I don't see that this refutes my point. You've posted something that looks correct and that someone that doesn't know better would think is correct but has a high probability of being incorrect. I do not view that as useful. Edit: HN isn't going to let me respond any further. I'm not talking about ML not being useful. That comment was specific to ChatGPT. The hype is always centered on solving hard problems like vehicles that can drive themselves in arbitrary conditions.
- agolio 4y ago
  Improved medical diagnoses are useful. Cars that drive themselves are useful. Improved inventory tracking is useful. Improved fraud detection is useful. Those are a very very minor subset of the vast array of real-world AI use cases. Edit to respond to your edit :) Yes ChatGPT is surely overhyped, same as GANs were five years ago, but these things have a whole ton of co-incidencing real-world applications that aren't hyped which we don't see as much. For example facial recognition is so good now that governments are performing mass surveillance with it. Now I admit, this is not in anyone here's opinion a good change. But it is a very real very existing phenomena. BTW - hope my comment did not come across too confrontational. Just need to defend my AI colleagues ;) --- Edit to add one more tangental thought that crossed my mind There's a temptation amongst skeptics to say that technology never lives up to the hype - we were told in the 70s robots would replace us, etc., But I think the reason we feel like it never lives up to the hype is because there is a moving target effect taking place. The present will never feel "sci-fi" because as soon as technology comes, the "sci-fi" target moves ahead. But when you look objectively at the technology around us, there are so many absolutely incredible developments in the last 10-20 years. They just have become normalised.

by agolio 4y ago

bachmeier 4y ago

I don't see that this refutes my point. You've posted something that looks correct and that someone that doesn't know better would think is correct but has a high probability of being incorrect. I do not view that as useful. Edit: HN isn't going to let me respond any further. I'm not talking about ML not being useful. That comment was specific to ChatGPT. The hype is always centered on solving hard problems like vehicles that can drive themselves in arbitrary conditions.

agolio 4y ago
Improved medical diagnoses are useful. Cars that drive themselves are useful. Improved inventory tracking is useful. Improved fraud detection is useful. Those are a very very minor subset of the vast array of real-world AI use cases. Edit to respond to your edit :) Yes ChatGPT is surely overhyped, same as GANs were five years ago, but these things have a whole ton of co-incidencing real-world applications that aren't hyped which we don't see as much. For example facial recognition is so good now that governments are performing mass surveillance with it. Now I admit, this is not in anyone here's opinion a good change. But it is a very real very existing phenomena. BTW - hope my comment did not come across too confrontational. Just need to defend my AI colleagues ;) --- Edit to add one more tangental thought that crossed my mind There's a temptation amongst skeptics to say that technology never lives up to the hype - we were told in the 70s robots would replace us, etc., But I think the reason we feel like it never lives up to the hype is because there is a moving target effect taking place. The present will never feel "sci-fi" because as soon as technology comes, the "sci-fi" target moves ahead. But when you look objectively at the technology around us, there are so many absolutely incredible developments in the last 10-20 years. They just have become normalised.