4 ms·
https://twitter.com/IlariKaila/status/1600120645211201536 https://twitter.com/IlariKaila/status/1600120645211201536 Ilari Kaila @IlariKaila · 1h Replying t
by tareqak 4y ago
https://twitter.com/IlariKaila/status/1600120645211201536 https://twitter.com/IlariKaila/status/1600120645211201536
Ilari Kaila
@IlariKaila
·
1h
Replying to
@paulg
Why did you delete this banger?
<Screenshot of a now deleted tweet by @paulg with the words: “Automation is an inductive proof that Marx was wrong”>
|
|
|
Paul Graham
@paulg
·
1h
Replying to
@IlariKaila
I forgot that mentioning Marx attracts angry fools. Since I could make my point without mentioning him, I just reposted it without.
- bentlegen 4y agoI always find this take that innovation wouldn’t happen in a non-capitalist society very strange, as if humanity hadn’t produced countless innovations before modern constructs like the corporation existed. I also think its incredulous to focus on one (admittedly, very) positive outcome of capitalism without acknowledging its externalities, like pollution, inequality, etc. I suppose pg believes the current system will lead to a post-scarcity society in which none of those exist. Perhaps that’s true, but I hope the planet survives long enough to get there.
- VictorPath 4y agoIt's not like a socialist country could invent things like a satellite, and be the society that figures out how to send a man into space, probes to the moon and other planets - oh yaa, a socialist country is the first country to figure out those things.
- VictorPath 4y agoActually Marx talked a lot about automation. Marx's prediction was this would lead to a lower rate of profit for invested capital which - mainstream establishment sources say is what has been happening.
- bowsamic 4y agoYes I have no idea why Paul would say this. I guess he realised he was wrong and thus he deleted it, but he won’t admit that. So many people online who make fun of Marx haven’t read any of Capital