I'm confused by your numbers - it's not 1,500 procedures, it's 1,500 animals, and we have quotes like " Reuters identified four experiments involving 86 pigs an

I'm confused by your numbers - it's not 1,500 procedures, it's 1,500 animals, and we have quotes like " Reuters identified four experiments involving 86 pigs and two monkeys that were marred in recent years by human errors", so I have no idea where your 0.1% number comes from. Even just the 25 pigs that had the wrong implants installed brings that number up to greater than 1%.