This is a dangerous rhetorical maneuver, though, because it: 1. Accepts the existence and influence of social-media-induced illness: 2. Does not rigorously de

This is a dangerous rhetorical maneuver, though, because it: 1. Accepts the existence and influence of social-media-induced illness: 2. Does not rigorously define the condition, it's symptoms, scope or mechanism: 3. Therefore, leaving us free to apply it to gender identity or really, anything at all. Trumpism? SMII. Wokeness? SMII. Pro-union sentiment? You're not gonna believe this, also a SMII. And once you call something a "disease" the implication is that it should be "cured" which gets scary quick.