4 ms·
Issues has a negative connotation. Staking withdrawals were >intentionally< not enabled to give the system more stability in the short term. Unstaking, in a FIF
by meowkit 4y ago
Issues has a negative connotation. Staking withdrawals were >intentionally< not enabled to give the system more stability in the short term. Unstaking, in a FIFO manner, has a roadmap you can read about with a quick web search.
- Nursie 4y agoOK but AFAICT there has been some upset about how long it's taking, and the withdrawal of the timetable for this? https://cointelegraph.com/news/ether-staking-withdrawal-schedule-removal-faces-harsh-criticism https://cointelegraph.com/news/ether-staking-withdrawal-sche... Perhaps I'm wrong and it's all been sorted out now. As a die-hard crypto sceptic I'm not always the best informed, but I am happy that the energy usage has been addressed.
- TimJRobinson 4y agoJust bagholders of other coins (all the tweets linked in this article seem to be Cardano people, sometimes it's Bitcoin Maxis) trying to spread FUD. I've yet to see anyone who's actually staking Ethereum care.
- jules-jules 4y agoIt will allow restaking and help LSDs trading at a discount to NAV close the gap, but other than that, I agree noone in the staking community is particularly worried about withdrawal activation timelines. Best guess based on the latest dev calls is sometime in Q2 2023.