5 ms·

Even if you believe that the earth is overpopulated and think a shrinking population is good, you still need to consider the sustainability of that population c

by dmm 4y ago

Even if you believe that the earth is overpopulated and think a shrinking population is good, you still need to consider the sustainability of that population change. Birth rates below replacement means that the proportion of elderly increases every year, forever. This means an every increasing proportion of resources has to be transferred from the working to non-working population. It will become harder and harder for young people to build wealth and support themselves and it means fewer resources to solve the other very big problems we have such as climate change.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
wildrhythms 4y ago
I don't forsee climate change being addressed under today's economic system of 'build wealth and support themselves', so I'm not sure what kind of world you envision.
- dmm 4y ago
  Do you think it would addressed under destroy wealth and neglect themselves? lol What are you even saying? I was just trying to say that as the proportion of retired people increases they will take more resources and that will mean fewer resources for /anything/ else.
StanislavPetrov 4y ago
>Birth rates below replacement means that the proportion of elderly increases every year, forever. Not when life expectancy decreases, as it is here in the United States. >It will become harder and harder for young people to build wealth and support themselves and it means fewer resources to solve the other very big problems we have such as climate change. "Big problems" like climate change because much less "big" when other problems grow more pressing and threatening to immediate survival. People who don't have a roof over their heads or a meal to eat aren't concerned with climate change.
- dmm 4y ago
  > Not when life expectancy decreases, as it is here in the United States. That's scary! Do you think life expectancy to continue to decrease? > People who don't have a roof over their heads or a meal to eat aren't concerned with climate change. Sure that's what I was trying to communicate. Climate change won't be a priority when people are struggling but it doesn't go away...

by dmm 4y ago

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

wildrhythms 4y ago

I don't forsee climate change being addressed under today's economic system of 'build wealth and support themselves', so I'm not sure what kind of world you envision.

dmm 4y ago
Do you think it would addressed under destroy wealth and neglect themselves? lol What are you even saying? I was just trying to say that as the proportion of retired people increases they will take more resources and that will mean fewer resources for /anything/ else.

StanislavPetrov 4y ago

>Birth rates below replacement means that the proportion of elderly increases every year, forever. Not when life expectancy decreases, as it is here in the United States. >It will become harder and harder for young people to build wealth and support themselves and it means fewer resources to solve the other very big problems we have such as climate change. "Big problems" like climate change because much less "big" when other problems grow more pressing and threatening to immediate survival. People who don't have a roof over their heads or a meal to eat aren't concerned with climate change.

dmm 4y ago
> Not when life expectancy decreases, as it is here in the United States. That's scary! Do you think life expectancy to continue to decrease? > People who don't have a roof over their heads or a meal to eat aren't concerned with climate change. Sure that's what I was trying to communicate. Climate change won't be a priority when people are struggling but it doesn't go away...