3 ms·
I've seen more criticism of facial recognition surveillance on the grounds that it is less accurate for some races, than on the grounds that, if it worked perfe
by pannSun 4y ago
I've seen more criticism of facial recognition surveillance on the grounds that it is less accurate for some races, than on the grounds that, if it worked perfectly, it would result in a massive loss of freedom, so this is no strawman:
https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/sciencepolicy/blog/racial-discrimination-face-recognition-technology https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/sciencepolicy/blog/racial-di...
https://theswaddle.com/how-facial-recognition-ai-reinforces-discrimination-against-trans-people/ https://theswaddle.com/how-facial-recognition-ai-reinforces-...
https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/how-is-face-recognition-surveillance-technology-racist https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/how-is-face-rec...
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facial-recognition-systems-racism-protests-police-bias/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/facial-recognition-systems-raci...
https://www.csis.org/blogs/technology-policy-blog/problem-bias-facial-recognition https://www.csis.org/blogs/technology-policy-blog/problem-bi...
https://www.cnet.com/science/why-facial-recognitions-racial-bias-problem-is-so-hard-to-crack/ https://www.cnet.com/science/why-facial-recognitions-racial-...
https://theconversation.com/ai-technologies-like-police-facial-recognition-discriminate-against-people-of-colour-143227 https://theconversation.com/ai-technologies-like-police-faci...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/12/19/federal-study-confirms-racial-bias-many-facial-recognition-systems-casts-doubt-their-expanding-use/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/12/19/federal...
https://exposure.org.uk/2021/09/why-facial-recognition-tech-perpetuates-discrimination/ https://exposure.org.uk/2021/09/why-facial-recognition-tech-...
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/04/racist-facial-recognition-white-coders-black-people-police https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/04/racist-fa...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/technology/facial-recognition-race-artificial-intelligence.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/technology/facial-recogni...
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2021/01/ban-dangerous-facial-recognition-technology-that-amplifies-racist-policing/ https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2021/01/ban-...
https://www.npr.org/2020/06/24/882683463/the-computer-got-it-wrong-how-facial-recognition-led-to-a-false-arrest-in-michig https://www.npr.org/2020/06/24/882683463/the-computer-got-it...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2019/12/19/facial-recognition-study-finds-results-biased-race-gender-and-age/2704291001/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2019/12/19/facial-recogn...
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/07/defund-facial-recognition/613771/ https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/07/defun...
But in the interest of accuracy, "only" was hyperbole - there is some criticism on non-discriminatory grounds. It's just overshadowed by concerns on whether the hell we are building will be racist.
- blueflow 4y agoCan you post like, only one link, but one that makes a good point that holds up to scrutiny? I'm not feeling in the mood to search through 20 ad-riddled pages to find something backing up your point. It should be your job picking it out.
- pannSun 4y agoThose are all examples of stories complaining specifically about facial-recognition working worse for some races. The quantity, and prominence of the institutions spouting them, is the point.
- blueflow 4y agoThere were also tons of stories decrying internet memes as hate symbols, so "The quantity, and prominence of the institutions spouting them" is not a valid argument. Which data backs up your point?
- pannSun 4y agoI think we're misunderstanding each-other. My point is that prominent institutions object to surveillance mostly on grounds of discrimination (and this is reflected in the masses, such as the comment I replied to). So examples of those institutions doing exactly that absolutely backs up my point. My evidence isn't perfect - for that, I'd have to collect an unbiased sample of anti-surveillance stories, and categorize them according to which object to surveillance universally, and which mostly object to only discriminatory surveillance. But the impression I got through casual web browsing is that the latter significantly outnumber the former.
- MockObject 4y ago> "The quantity, and prominence of the institutions spouting them" is not a valid argument. It's actually a very solid argument against the charge of having offered a Strawman.
- wereallterrrist 4y ago