5 ms·
Imagine you start the same trend, but everyone tries for once to contribute something science wise original to society, so the problem is real, but the potentia
by winReInstall 4y ago
Imagine you start the same trend, but everyone tries for once to contribute something science wise original to society, so the problem is real, but the potential is greater.
Now comes the part, were advertisers try to create sociogenic illnesses that spread theire product/brands information.
We can also skip directly to the part, were we mourn the youtfull ideals of a idea, taken over by scammers.
- secondcoming 4y agoThere was the alcohol drinks company's WASSSUP ad campaign that ruined everyone's life for a while.
- mcphage 4y agoThat still lives rent-free in my head, and comes out every once in a while.
- dejj 4y agoLink this with the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, and receive prescribed brand candy/placebos for saying “Arr!” too much. Also prosthetics or an assistance bird.
- Sebb767 4y ago> Imagine you start the same trend, but everyone tries for once to contribute something science wise original to society, so the problem is real, but the potential is greater. I know you aren't totally serious, but this won't work, most likely. The "advantage" of having a tick like that is not just that it gives you attention, it's something absolutely low-effort and instant gratification. Contributing to science is anything but. Plus, even if individuals tried to do so, it's quite easy to miss newest research or fall for a fallacy, which will make for a net-negative contribution if you are not careful.
- dpc050505 4y ago>were advertisers try to create sociogenic illnesses that spread theire product/brands information. I can think of a lot of advertising jingles that work this way.
- riskable 4y agoPlop plop Fizz fizz Oh how like Tourette's it is