What's wrong with updating our definition of "intelligence" based on new data? 500 years ago people presumably thought that lifting heavy objects required "mus

What's wrong with updating our definition of "intelligence" based on new data? 500 years ago people presumably thought that lifting heavy objects required "muscles". Nowadays you can do it with metal and hydraulics. Surely robots must therefore have muscles. If you deny that then you're shifting the "muscles" goalposts?!