> on a whim it wasn't on a whim. > ... is less egregious than doing so long term? obviously it is, yes. For example, plenty of people just avoided travel dur

> on a whim it wasn't on a whim. > ... is less egregious than doing so long term? obviously it is, yes. For example, plenty of people just avoided travel during that time and managed to not have to use an app. If it was ongoing that wouldn't be the case. The precedent that has been set is: if there is ever another crisis of that scale, using a smartphone app to try to mitigate it is one of the options on the table. That doesn't seem like a bad thing to me.