3 ms·
Good question, thanks! I think divisive political or social messages would fall under the providers right to decline based on personal morals, that don't invol
by Nevermark 4y ago
Good question, thanks!
I think divisive political or social messages would fall under the providers right to decline based on personal morals, that don't involve making distinctions dependent on a protected customer class.
But it would be a problem if the cake maker was ok making very divisive cakes favorable to white supremacists, but then refused to make similarly divisive cakes associated with other races or religions. As that inconsistency would indicate the supplier was making distinctions based on protected classes (i.e. religion, race).
- Georgelemental 4y agoWhat do you mean by "divisive"? How do you define that in a court of law?
- Nevermark 4y agoThe supplier can define divisive, or objectionable in general, in any way they want as long as it doesn't result in protected classes of people being treated differently. A cake maker is fully within their rights to refuse to make blue cake, if they don't like blue, for example.