3 ms·
True, but it's a cost of doing the business. In general, if there was a way where we could do that processing with less animal suffering we would. In Neuralin
by iancmceachern 4y ago
True, but it's a cost of doing the business. In general, if there was a way where we could do that processing with less animal suffering we would. In Neuralinks case they could have done their business with less animal suffering, and chose not to.
- 93po 4y ago> they could have done their business with less animal suffering, and chose not to This is true of literally any animal impacting business and Neuralink is by far the least worst offender if these allegations even wind up being true.
- iancmceachern 4y agoThey are not by far the least worst offender. Medtronic, J&J, all the big med tech and pharma companies do this work day in out, for decades, and none of them do it this way. Neuralink is by the far the worst, and that is why there are articles and former employees saying so.