3 ms·
I partly agree with you, however it's possible for devices to have limited access to the internet, or even no direct access but still be accessible to devices t
by Cogito 4y ago
I partly agree with you, however it's possible for devices to have limited access to the internet, or even no direct access but still be accessible to devices that are on the internet.
If I have a smart device at home I may put it on a network that has no outgoing access to the internet, but it would still be nice to be able to connect to it with a web browser without getting angry expired certificate warnings.
It's not the worst problem to have, and I don't think it's easy to fix, but it's still annoying.
- progmetaldev 4y agoA company extranet locked by a whitelist of IP addresses comes to mind. You still want a SSL installed for security.
- NavinF 4y agoYeah but that's a lot less common these days: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/login/articles/login_dec14_02_ward.pdf https://www.usenix.org/system/files/login/articles/login_dec... I don't want LE to waste money supporting such use cases.
- bombcar 4y agoEver since LE added wildcards it’s not as bad - get the cert on one machine, copy it via scripts to all.