This report too. [1] > The company’s statement does not change the fact that monkeys used by Neuralink at UC Davis had portions of their skulls removed and dev

This report too. [1] > The company’s statement does not change the fact that monkeys used by Neuralink at UC Davis had portions of their skulls removed and devices screwed to their heads, nor that Neuralink used a substance called “BioGlue,” which was not approved for use in these experiments and has been widely known to be toxic to nerve tissue since at least 2001. BioGlue came into contact with the surface of at least two monkeys' brains, causing damage and hemorrhaging; one monkey suffered for days after this damage. Monkey Holding Device [2] [1] https://www.pcrm.org/ethical-science/animals-in-medical-research/pcrm-response-neuralink-claims https://www.pcrm.org/ethical-science/animals-in-medical-rese... [2] https://www.pcrm.org/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/2022-02/nonhuman-primate-restraint-chair-neck-plate.jpg?itok=5svBxapn https://www.pcrm.org/sites/default/files/styles/medium/publi...