2 ms·
I would argue that things are "easily" testable when you can control all of the variables. For most of history, we have rarely ever controlled all variables ou
by taeric 4y ago
I would argue that things are "easily" testable when you can control all of the variables. For most of history, we have rarely ever controlled all variables outside of the easy cases. Typically, we define away much of the extra stuff. That has not stopped us testing what we can, just be sure to disclose everything else. Obviously, things are more confidently testable if you have controlled all variables, but that would be a crippling condition.
Basically, following the link in wikipedia will get you to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_control https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_control which allows for "A scientific control is an experiment or observation designed to minimize the effects of variables other than the independent variable (i.e. confounding variables)." Which is much less strongly stated than what you have. The idea is still there, of course.
- Cupertino95014 4y agook. It's not really a "crippling condition" when natural experiments do crop up from time to time, though. For example: if Amsterdam suddenly had an MHL, that would be one. In fact, any city that instituted MHL would be a natural experiment. The number of riders, the number of accidents, the % of accidents that involve injuries -- all those things would change, while the city design and transit situation (other than bikes) presumably would not.