> Not necessarily. Good HN content can also be factual information relevant to the topic at hand I reject this notion. for me, thats not good HN content. for m

> Not necessarily. Good HN content can also be factual information relevant to the topic at hand I reject this notion. for me, thats not good HN content. for me, thats not why I got to HN. Maybe to others, but not me. That said, factually incorrect content is bad, but being factually relevant is not enough. I don’t want a robot glossary filling up comments. Have you met know-it-alls that just spew factually relèvent regurgitation instead of thoughtful response?